Shin Bet Summons Political Activists for “Warning Conversations”


The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) filed a petition last Thursday (July 25) asking the High Court of Justice to order the General Security Service (Shin Bet) to stop its practice of summoning political activists for “warning conversations.”




The petition includes testimonies of political and civil society activists who were called in over the past year for “warning conversations” with Shin Bet agents. The testimonies reveal how these conversations, which were not formal investigations on suspicion of specific crimes, were used to deter activists who pursue agendas outside the consensus. The conversations included personal questions about the citizens’ political activities, relationships and finances. In some cases the agents raised general claims (but not specific allegations) about involvement in disturbances of the peace; in others, activists were told explicitly that while “for now” they were not suspected of violating the law, they should be careful not to do so in the future.


The petition was filed by ACRI Attorney Lila Margalit and Attorney Karen Tamir, It argues that bringing political activists in for such warnings exceeds the legal authority of the Shin Bet and violates the citizens’ fundamental constitutional rights – first and foremost the freedom of expression and protest, and also the rights to dignity, privacy, freedom, equality and due process. The Shin Bet is a clandestine security agency that possesses wide-ranging powers – including the power to wiretap citizens’ phones (with approval of the Prime Minister) and use communications metadata without judicial oversight. In a democratic society, political activity does not constitute a “security threat” that justifies the intervention of an organization like the Shin Bet. Any concerns about violations of the law during political protests should be addressed by the police within the confines of the regular criminal law.


The petition cites, among other sources, a section from the 2012 Annual Summary published on the Shin Bet website, in which, under the title “Radical Right and Left” it is noted that “Shin Bet information, passed to the state enforcement agencies, has helped to curb acts of delegitimization of Israel.”


Attorney Lila Margalit: “Calling political activists in for friendly conversations over a cup of tea with undercover Shin Bet agents is not a practice that characterizes a democratic regime. The Shin Bet, entrusted to deal with serious security threats, possesses far-reaching powers, some of which are very problematic. It is intolerable for civil protest or political activism – even if it involves disruptions of the peace – to be classified as a security threat. The policy of calling in activists for warnings violates the constitutional rights not just of the activists actually called in, but also of all those individuals who refrain from political involvement as a result.”


Related Materials

To read the petition (in Hebrew) click here.

To read about ACRI’s earlier interventions to restrict similar conversations with right-wing activists, click here.

  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Categories: Democracy and Civil Liberties, Freedom of Expression, The Right to Privacy

Tags:, |

Comments are closed.